While we're on the theme of Democrats ALWAYS fighting dirty and hitting below the belt, how about that Mayoral election in Los Angeles?
This is how it goes. The Republican ''leads'' on Election Night (or is in position to move on to the general election), then the ''vote counters'' keep counting FOR UP TO A MONTH AFTER ELECTION DAY until the Democrat(s) ''find'' the ballots they need to close the margin. After Election Night, the Democrats always know how MANY VOTES THEY NEED TO OVERTAKE THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE AND ''WIN''.
In the 2026 Los Angeles Mayoral Election, there are 3 major candidates. We have two incompetent, corrupt communists, incumbant Mayor Karen Bass and City Council member Nithia Raman. Then, there's the outsider, former reality-TV star and advocate Spencer Pratt. In this primary, the two top vote getters move on and face each other in a November general Election. The third-place finsher is eliminated.
On Primary Night, Bass had a small lead, and Pratt was comfortably in second. Raman tearfully conceded.. Then the ''ballot-counters'' swung into ''action'' Almost a week later, the third place candidate has caught up and candidate Pratt has been eliminated. It's simply amazing how late ballot counting ALWAYS go to the DEMOCRATS.
A normal, fair-thinking person would be outraged by the unfairness of this system. The problem is, that it's legal............IN CALIFORNIA BECAUSE THOSE ARE THE CORRUPT ELECTION LAWS PASSED IN THE ONE-PARTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Almost the instant that candidate Raman's vote total overtook candidate Pratt's, the news announcers declared that she would be facing incumbant Bass in the general election in November. We don't know or think that the democrats running the unfair election system will bother to keep counting ballots.
It's highly suspicious NEARLY EVERY BALLOT DUMP COUNTED AFTER ELECTION DAY MOST OF THE VOTES WENT TO THE THIRD PLACE CANDIDATE Nithia Raman. You would think that al least a third of these late ballots would go to the CORRUPT, INCOMPETENT leader.
It would be better and more fair if NO ONE KNEW THE VOTE TOTALS on Election Night, or if the state kept the cabdidate's numbers secret. Glenn Beck suggests that Price-Waterhouse should be put in charge of ballots in California. THE DEMOCRATS WOULDN'T KNOW HOW MANY MORE VOTES THEY WOULD NEED TO OVERTAKE THE REPUBLICAN'S VOTE TOTAL.
Spencer Pratt is the most talked about, inventive candidate in recent political history. The incompetent, corrupt leftists that run L.A. let his house burn to the ground, along with thousands of Palisades residents. He spoke about the homeless drug zombie PROBLEM in a very compelling way, while his two opponents have ran away from the issues and THEIR HORRENDOUS RECORD. The two incompetent communists are in and the conscientious advocate is out because Los Angeles is a corrupt, one-party city.
It is possible that candidate Pratt lost because all The Republicans and dissatisfied Democrats have moved away (voted with their feet) and the numbers just weren't there.
In Republican-run states and cities, the people vote on Election Day, then go home and watch the returns as the vote-counters finish counting the ballots and a winner is announced THAT NIGHT.
In corrupt states and cities ran by Democrats, they MAIL ballots to EVERYBODY, let illegal aliens vote, ''dead'' people VOTE, they allow ballot harvesting, crooked government unions get ''involved'', they vote early, vote LATE, have surprise ballot dumps, ballot stuffing, the homeless are BRIBED into voting by the Democrats in power, not to mention MANY OTHER METHODS OF open, brazen cheating.
In conclusion, your bushy-tailed correspondent has one more question about all this. Is there any difference between ''ballot dumps'' and ''ballot stuffing''?
No comments:
Post a Comment